Wednesday , 17 January 2018

Home » WORLD NEWS » At the Fed, not all policymakers are equal

At the Fed, not all policymakers are equal

WASHINGTON – Janet Yellen’s Federal Reserve has demonstrated one of the core tenets of central banking: On the Fed panel that sets interest rates, some votes are more equal than others.

The panel — the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) — voted Wednesday to keep rates unchanged, something it has done for six straight meetings. What was unusual this time was that the result drew dissenting votes from three members — the most dissents in nearly two years.

The 7-3 vote reflected “no” votes from the presidents of three regional Fed banks: Esther George of Kansas City, Loretta Mester of Cleveland and Eric Rosengren of Boston. All wanted to raise rates immediately. And all were powerless to do so.

Fed nixes U.S. interest rate increase

Play Video

CBSN

Fed nixes U.S. interest rate increase

The Federal Reserve is keeping U.S. interest rates the same. Rick Newman from Yahoo! Finance joins CBSN to explain what this means for the econom…

Not since December 2015, when Ben Bernanke led the Fed, had so many policymakers dissented from a Fed vote. But critically, the “no” votes Wednesday included none of the Fed’s influential board members in Washington.

The FOMC’s voting members comprise seven board members in Washington (two spots are vacanct), the head of the New York regional Fed and four of the 11 other regional bank presidents who serve on the FOMC on a rotating basis.

The last time any of the seven board members has dissented from a Fed policy vote was more than a decade ago, in 2005.

That’s where the unequal nature of Fed votes comes in. The Fed isn’t like the Supreme Court, where 5-4 rulings are common. Fed leaders generally prefer votes that are unanimous or nearly so, to foster confidence among investors that it’s pursuing rate policies that command broad support.

But if Fed leaders can’t get all voting members of the FOMC to back them, they can still preserve market confidence if they enjoy the support of all members of the board. Like the Fed chair, the board members are hand-picked by the president and confirmed by the Senate to a job in which they’re supposed to represent the entire country.

By contrast, the regional bank presidents are chosen by the boards of each regional bank. They tend to represent the views of business leaders in their districts, and they are often perceived as being sympathetic to banking interests and quicker to support increases in interest rates.

What savers should do while interest rates are low

Play Video

MoneyWatch

What savers should do while interest rates are low

As expected, the Federal Reserve made no change to its policy, but in a shift, the central bank lowered its projections of how much it expects to…

Once during the mid-1980s, when then Fed Chair Paul Volcker was outvoted by the seven-member board, he went to Treasury Secretary James Baker and offered to resign. Baker resolved the conflict by persuading Fed board members to change their votes and back Volcker.

Yellen, like most of her predecessors, has managed to maintain solid support among the board and the New York Fed president. Wednesday’s vote showed that the chair, mindful that she and her allies represent the central bank’s power base, isn’t unduly bothered by a trio of dissents from regional bank presidents.

“Yellen is not losing control of the committee,” said Brian Bethune, an economics professor at Tufts University in Boston. “As long as a Fed chair has the support of the board, she will feel comfortable.”

That doesn’t mean the regional Fed presidents have no influence. Some economists say they think the Fed’s statement Wednesday was shaped to signal that a rate hike is coming, probably in December, in part because of the growing number of dissents.

“Three dissents are not normal; they are rare,” said David Jones, who has written books on the Fed’s history. “This is something Yellen is going to have to deal with.”

The betting is that she’ll deal with it by steering the committee to support a rate hike by year-end. Analysts said they would be expecting a rate hike at the next meeting in November if it were not occurring less than a week before the presidential election. They think the Fed wouldn’t want to be raising rates so close to the election for fear of being seen as influencing the vote.

Far from seeming flustered by Wednesday’s three dissents, Yellen said at a news conference that it’s helpful that the Fed’s policy panel represents a range of views.

Said Yellen: “The FOMC is not a body that suffers from group-think.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Receive News & Ratings Via Email - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

At the Fed, not all policymakers are equal Reviewed by on . WASHINGTON - Janet Yellen’s Federal Reserve has demonstrated one of the core tenets of central banking: On the Fed panel that sets interest rates, some votes ar WASHINGTON - Janet Yellen’s Federal Reserve has demonstrated one of the core tenets of central banking: On the Fed panel that sets interest rates, some votes ar Rating:
scroll to top